Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-02-01 → 2013-02-28 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-02-01 → 2013-02-28 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-02-01 → 2013-02-28 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-02-01 → 2013-02-28 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-02 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-02 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0055 µg/L | 2/4 | 2024 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 1380 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1950 µg/L | 82/194 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 62.32 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 102 µg/L | 70/70 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 17.052 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L | 69/70 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 83.46 µg/L 104% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 118 µg/L | 68/69 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.917 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.03 µg/L | 67/70 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 25.075 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 38.4 µg/L | 66/69 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 53.57 µg/L 89% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 62.5 µg/L | 62/69 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 29.69 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 36.4 µg/L | 62/69 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 418.8 µg/L 32% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 799 µg/L | 49/81 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1380 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1950 µg/L | 41/97 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0019 mg/L 13% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 18/18 | LCR | 2024 |
| Fluoride | 936 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 950 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.8070 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8100 µg/L | 7/70 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.67 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L | 7/69 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 34.44 µg/L 1.7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 35.8 µg/L | 5/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 7.535 µg/L 50% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.6 µg/L | 2/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.495 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 2/69 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.945 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L | 2/69 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
63 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Mount Orab Village
Is Mount Orab Village tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Mount Orab Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Mount Orab Village's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Mount Orab Village serve?
Mount Orab Village reports serving 6,607 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has Mount Orab Village had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 101 violations on file for Mount Orab Village, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.