Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-10-01 → 2010-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-10-01 → 2010-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-10-01 → 2010-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-10-01 → 2010-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2026-01-07 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-02 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 25.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.3 µg/L | 116/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 25.35 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.3 µg/L | 116/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 30.15 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34.7 µg/L | 116/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 79.875 µg/L 100% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 97.1 µg/L | 116/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 17.52 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.5 µg/L | 115/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 5.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.8 µg/L | 115/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.49 µg/L | 108/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 14.56 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 18 µg/L | 107/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 6.084 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.33 µg/L | 29/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 21/21 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate | 246 µg/L 2.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 14/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.9305 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L | 12/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 20 µg/L 133% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 26 µg/L | 11/95 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Copper | 110 µg/L 8.5% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 10/95 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.292 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.48 µg/L | 5/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 177 µg/L 1.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 180 µg/L | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Fluoride | 864.75 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 872 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lithium | 12.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/2 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Barium | 29 µg/L 1.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Chromium | 1 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Selenium | 3 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
61 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Ashland City
Is Ashland City tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Ashland City's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Ashland City's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Ashland City serve?
Ashland City reports serving 20,648 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has Ashland City had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 16 violations on file for Ashland City, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.