Is Wyoming Correctional Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Wyoming

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2023-11-01
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2023-11-01
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
TTHM	91.51 µg/L 114% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L worst single sample: 98.1 µg/L	24/24	SYR4	2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	86.65 µg/L 144% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L worst single sample: 123.9 µg/L	24/24	SYR4	2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane	14.705 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 14.8 µg/L	20/20	SYR4	2013–2018
Chloroform	72.88 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 82 µg/L	20/20	SYR4	2013–2018
Dibromochloromethane	1.531 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.12 µg/L	20/20	SYR4	2013–2018
Dichloroacetic Acid	26.6 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 30 µg/L	18/18	SYR4	2014–2018
Trichloroacetic Acid	50.1 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 62 µg/L	18/18	SYR4	2014–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid	3.35 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L	11/17	SYR4	2014–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid	1.2705 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L	8/17	SYR4	2014–2018
Lead	0.0110 mg/L 73% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	6/6	LCR	2006

2 contaminants tested, none detected

BromoformDibromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact: BROWN, DOUGLAS
Phone: 585-591-1010

Frequently asked questions about Wyoming Correctional

Is Wyoming Correctional tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Wyoming Correctional's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Wyoming Correctional's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Wyoming Correctional serve?

Wyoming Correctional reports serving 1,600 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Wyoming Correctional had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 40 violations on file for Wyoming Correctional, of which 15 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.