← New York

Tap water quality report

Attica Correctional

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 12 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

12
contaminants tested
11
detected
2,000
people served
7
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
State government
Counties served
Wyoming

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

7
health-based violations
48
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-12-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-12-01
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-10-01 → 2020-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-10-01 → 2020-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-10-01 → 2020-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2008-12-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2008-12-01
MON Monitoring Archived 2026-02-01 → 2026-02-28
MON Monitoring Archived 2025-02-01 → 2025-02-28
MON Monitoring Resolved 2023-12-01 → 2023-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
85.42 µg/L 107%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 102.1 µg/L
29/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
70.24 µg/L 117%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 76 µg/L
29/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
45.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48.2 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromodichloromethane
11.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.7 µg/L
21/21 SYR4 2012–2018
Chloroform
63.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 71.6 µg/L
21/21 SYR4 2012–2018
Dichloroacetic Acid
25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L
21/22 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromochloromethane
1.512 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.56 µg/L
17/21 SYR4 2012–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.36 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L
13/21 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.392 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.52 µg/L
9/21 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0110 mg/L 73%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
6/6 LCR 2006
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.5885 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.64 µg/L
2/22 SYR4 2012–2018
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Bromoform

Utility contact

Contact
BAKER, MICHAEL
Phone
585-591-2000
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Attica Correctional

Is Attica Correctional tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Attica Correctional's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Attica Correctional's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Attica Correctional serve?

Attica Correctional reports serving 2,000 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Attica Correctional had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 48 violations on file for Attica Correctional, of which 7 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.