← New York

Tap water quality report

Attica Village

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 71 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

71
contaminants tested
18
detected
2,659
people served
41
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Wyoming

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

41
health-based violations
48
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-04-01 → 2013-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-01-01 → 2013-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-01-01 → 2013-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Fluoride
1000 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1160 µg/L
56/56 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
108 µg/L 135%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 112 µg/L
41/41 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
97.345 µg/L 162%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 128.7 µg/L
40/41 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
13.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
37/37 SYR4 2012–2018
Chloroform
94.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 100 µg/L
36/37 SYR4 2012–2018
Dichloroacetic Acid
39.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 45 µg/L
36/37 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromochloromethane
1.645 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.82 µg/L
35/37 SYR4 2012–2018
Trichloroacetic Acid
63.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 77 µg/L
34/37 SYR4 2012–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
5.21 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.1 µg/L
19/37 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
16/16 LCR 2024
Nitrate
1120 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
14/37 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
38.065 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 39.5 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
0.7900 µg/L 7.9%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.8000 µg/L
3/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Antimony, Total
0.4950 µg/L 8.3%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.5000 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Beryllium, Total
0.3000 µg/L 7.5%
of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.5 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
Mercury
0.6000 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
53 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMethoxychlorOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BECK, BRENDA
Phone
585-591-0898
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Attica Village

Is Attica Village tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Attica Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Attica Village's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Attica Village serve?

Attica Village reports serving 2,659 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Attica Village had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 48 violations on file for Attica Village, of which 41 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.