← New York

Tap water quality report

Pleasantville Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 42 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

42
contaminants tested
10
detected
9,550
people served
5
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Westchester

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

5
health-based violations
42
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-07-01 → 2009-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-07-01 → 2009-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-04-01 → 1999-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-04-01 → 1999-04-30
TT Health-based Resolved 1992-01-01 → 1998-07-01
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-02-01 → 2024-02-29
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-02-01 → 2024-02-29
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-02-01 → 2024-02-29
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-02-01 → 2024-02-29
MON Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-07-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
20.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L
54/54 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
25.105 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 32 µg/L
54/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
3.464 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L
53/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.188 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.41 µg/L
53/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
13.436 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 19.5 µg/L
53/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
6.198 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.55 µg/L
53/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
7.434 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.2 µg/L
52/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
26/26 LCR 2025
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.8562 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.87 µg/L
5/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.41 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/54 SYR4 2012–2019
32 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformHfpo-DaMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
CARR, ANTHONY
Phone
914-769-3883
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Pleasantville Water District

Is Pleasantville Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Pleasantville Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Pleasantville Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Pleasantville Water District serve?

Pleasantville Water District reports serving 9,550 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Pleasantville Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 42 violations on file for Pleasantville Water District, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.