← New York

Tap water quality report

Greenburgh Consolidated Wd #1

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 42 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

42
contaminants tested
10
detected
86,624
people served
13
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Westchester

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

13
health-based violations
20
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2015-05-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2015-05-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2015-05-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-08-01 → 1999-08-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1999-08-01 → 1999-08-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1999-08-01 → 1999-08-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1999-07-01 → 1999-07-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
4.985 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L
124/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
45.85 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 67 µg/L
124/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
47 µg/L 78%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 52.2 µg/L
124/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
20 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25 µg/L
123/124 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
50.93 µg/L 64%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 72.2 µg/L
123/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
28 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.6 µg/L
122/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0013 mg/L 8.6%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
19/19 LCR 2025
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.43 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L
8/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
6.862 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.9 µg/L
2/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/124 SYR4 2012–2019
32 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformDibromochloromethaneHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
FON, RICHARD
Phone
914-989-1575

Frequently asked questions about Greenburgh Consolidated Wd #1

Is Greenburgh Consolidated Wd #1 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Greenburgh Consolidated Wd #1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Greenburgh Consolidated Wd #1's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Greenburgh Consolidated Wd #1 serve?

Greenburgh Consolidated Wd #1 reports serving 86,624 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Greenburgh Consolidated Wd #1 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 20 violations on file for Greenburgh Consolidated Wd #1, of which 13 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.