Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-12-01 → 2011-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-12-01 → 2011-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-12-01 → 2011-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-12-01 → 2011-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-03-01 → 1996-03-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-02-01 → 1995-02-28 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-02-01 → 1995-02-28 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-02-01 → 1995-02-28 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-02-01 → 1995-02-28 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-02-01 → 1995-02-28 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 17 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19 µg/L | 107/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 29 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32 µg/L | 107/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 8.575 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 106/106 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 55 µg/L 69% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 60 µg/L | 106/106 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 11.45 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 µg/L | 98/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 23 µg/L 38% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 33 µg/L | 98/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1000 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 9000 µg/L | 89/89 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 8.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 89/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 2.44 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L | 64/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.81 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 20/108 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 540 µg/L 5.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.96 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 15/108 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0028 mg/L 19% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2023 |
| Chromium | 3.26 µg/L 3.3% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L | 9/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 22.65 µg/L 1.1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 23 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.255 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L | 2/108 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.4000 µg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.9000 pCi/L 18% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 449 µg/L 4.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
87 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Ontario Town Benefit Area #1
Is Ontario Town Benefit Area #1 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Ontario Town Benefit Area #1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Ontario Town Benefit Area #1's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Ontario Town Benefit Area #1 serve?
Ontario Town Benefit Area #1 reports serving 10,136 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has Ontario Town Benefit Area #1 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 20 violations on file for Ontario Town Benefit Area #1, of which 14 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.