← New York

Tap water quality report

Golden Hill Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 12 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

12
contaminants tested
11
detected
1,600
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Ulster

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
9
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2012-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2012-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2012-10-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2008-03-01 → 2008-03-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2008-03-01 → 2008-03-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2008-02-01 → 2008-02-29
Other Monitoring Resolved 2008-02-01 → 2008-02-29
Other Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-01-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2008-01-01 → 2008-01-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
23.525 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 28.4 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
4.585 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.97 µg/L
31/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
60.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 65.2 µg/L
31/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
16.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.7 µg/L
31/32 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
65.3 µg/L 82%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 70.2 µg/L
31/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
9.22 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
30/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
0.8930 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9800 µg/L
7/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0053 mg/L 35%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2021
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.58 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
5/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
3.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
8.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/32 SYR4 2012–2019
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Dibromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
DYSARD, MATTHEW W.
Phone
845-338-5179

Frequently asked questions about Golden Hill Water District

Is Golden Hill Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Golden Hill Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Golden Hill Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Golden Hill Water District serve?

Golden Hill Water District reports serving 1,600 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Golden Hill Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 9 violations on file for Golden Hill Water District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.