Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2008-03-01 → 2008-03-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2008-03-01 → 2008-03-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2008-02-01 → 2008-02-29 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2008-02-01 → 2008-02-29 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2008-01-01 → 2008-01-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2008-01-01 → 2008-01-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 23.525 µg/L 39% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 28.4 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 4.585 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.97 µg/L | 31/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 60.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 65.2 µg/L | 31/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 16.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.7 µg/L | 31/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 65.3 µg/L 82% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 70.2 µg/L | 31/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 9.22 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 30/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 0.8930 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9800 µg/L | 7/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0053 mg/L 35% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2021 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.58 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 5/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 8.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Golden Hill Water District
Is Golden Hill Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Golden Hill Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Golden Hill Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Golden Hill Water District serve?
Golden Hill Water District reports serving 1,600 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has Golden Hill Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 9 violations on file for Golden Hill Water District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.