← New York

Tap water quality report

Malden Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 12 contaminants and detected 9. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

12
contaminants tested
9
detected
460
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Ulster

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
23
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2017-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2017-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2017-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
6.88 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
54.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 55 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.524 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.62 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
9.93 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0014 mg/L 9.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2023
TTHM
61.8 µg/L 77%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 63 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
23.2 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 25 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
19 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
3 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
SAUGERTIES TOWN SUPERVISOR
Phone
845-246-2800

Frequently asked questions about Malden Water District

Is Malden Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 9 contaminants in Malden Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Malden Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Malden Water District serve?

Malden Water District reports serving 460 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Malden Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 23 violations on file for Malden Water District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.