← New York

Tap water quality report

New Paltz (Town) Water Distric

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 12 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

12
contaminants tested
11
detected
810
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Ulster

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
16
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Dichloroacetic Acid
34 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 43 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
64.35 µg/L 107%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 70 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
25.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28 µg/L
31/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
6.051 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.9 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
60.82 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 170 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
66.705 µg/L 83%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 182 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.045 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
12/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0131 mg/L 87%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
8/8 LCR 2023
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.43 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
8/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
0.5960 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.6000 µg/L
2/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/32 SYR4 2012–2019
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Bromoform

Utility contact

Contact
NEW PALTZ TOWN SUPERVISOR

Frequently asked questions about New Paltz (Town) Water Distric

Is New Paltz (Town) Water Distric tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in New Paltz (Town) Water Distric's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in New Paltz (Town) Water Distric's water?

EPA monitoring detected Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does New Paltz (Town) Water Distric serve?

New Paltz (Town) Water Distric reports serving 810 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has New Paltz (Town) Water Distric had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 16 violations on file for New Paltz (Town) Water Distric, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.