Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 1999-10-19 → 2000-05-17 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 1999-10-19 → 2000-05-17 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 3030 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3210 µg/L | 42/48 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 3066 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3210 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0033 mg/L 22% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2022 |
| TTHM | 26.56 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 36 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 7.2215 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.4 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Barium | 137.6 µg/L 6.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 140 µg/L | 5/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.798 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2015 |
| Bromoform | 3.444 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.56 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2015 |
| Chloroform | 1.2735 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.32 µg/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2015 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.88 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2015 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.812 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.89 µg/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2015 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.768 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.78 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2015 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.845 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.04 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2015 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.074 pCi/L 21% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.11 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Uranium | 0.5811 µg/L 1.9% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 0.6300 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2015 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 1.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2015 |
81 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Waverly Village
Is Waverly Village tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Waverly Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Waverly Village's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Waverly Village serve?
Waverly Village reports serving 4,830 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has Waverly Village had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 8 violations on file for Waverly Village, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.