Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2008-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2008-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-01-01 → 2006-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-01-01 → 2006-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-01-01 → 2006-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-01-01 → 2006-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 320 µg/L 3.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0017 mg/L 11% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2025 |
| Barium | 293.5 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 297 µg/L | 11/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 1.6 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 7/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 13.547 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.9 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 49.905 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 56.7 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.4155 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.69 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 17.915 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 67.96 µg/L 85% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 76.3 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 39.9 µg/L 66% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 45.6 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 18.12 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.1655 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.8035 pCi/L 16% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.8060 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Combined Uranium | 4.19365 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.41 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.675 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 0.8805 pCi/L 5.9% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.8900 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Chromium | 1.9 µg/L 1.9% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 0.9300 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | 0.6200 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
27 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Kiamesha Artesian Spring Water Company
Is Kiamesha Artesian Spring Water Company tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Kiamesha Artesian Spring Water Company's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Kiamesha Artesian Spring Water Company's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Barium, Arsenic, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Kiamesha Artesian Spring Water Company serve?
Kiamesha Artesian Spring Water Company reports serving 879 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has Kiamesha Artesian Spring Water Company had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 28 violations on file for Kiamesha Artesian Spring Water Company, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.