Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2021-06-30 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFOS | 0.0044 µg/L | 1/10 | 2024 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 3107.5 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3130 µg/L | 62/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1000 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 21/25 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 2660 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2800 µg/L | 21/21 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Chloroform | 28.22 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 91.9 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 59.26 µg/L 74% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 91.9 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 14.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.8 µg/L | 16/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 8.8975 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 16/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 16.25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 µg/L | 16/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 13.4 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 19 µg/L | 15/16 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 74.17 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 240 µg/L | 15/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.855 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.7 µg/L | 14/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 287 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 317 µg/L | 13/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.9142 pCi/L 38% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.17 pCi/L | 13/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 111.63 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 240 µg/L | 12/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0050 mg/L 33% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 11/11 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.185 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L | 4/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 25.34 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28 µg/L | 3/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroethylene | 0.5000 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
83 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Morningside Heights Wd / Erwin
Is Morningside Heights Wd / Erwin tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Morningside Heights Wd / Erwin's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Morningside Heights Wd / Erwin's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Fluoride, Nitrate-Nitrite, Chloroform, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Morningside Heights Wd / Erwin serve?
Morningside Heights Wd / Erwin reports serving 4,570 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has Morningside Heights Wd / Erwin had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 422 violations on file for Morningside Heights Wd / Erwin, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.