Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-11-01 → 2017-11-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-11-01 → 2017-11-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-04-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-04-01 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-10-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-10-01 → 2021-10-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-02-01 → 2021-02-28 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 10.46 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.6 µg/L | 29/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 76.72 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 77.9 µg/L | 29/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 87.48 µg/L 109% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 89.7 µg/L | 29/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 48.6 µg/L 81% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 52.7 µg/L | 29/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 22.28 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28 µg/L | 29/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 22.65 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28 µg/L | 28/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.525 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 16/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0050 mg/L 33% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 7.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8 µg/L | 6/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 5.385 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L | 4/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
32 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about North Greenbush Consolidated District
Is North Greenbush Consolidated District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in North Greenbush Consolidated District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in North Greenbush Consolidated District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does North Greenbush Consolidated District serve?
North Greenbush Consolidated District reports serving 10,226 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has North Greenbush Consolidated District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 15 violations on file for North Greenbush Consolidated District, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.