Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-04-01 → 2021-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 68.8 µg/L 115% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 110.5 µg/L | 126/126 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 10.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.4 µg/L | 124/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 95.39 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 126 µg/L | 124/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 34.85 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 50.6 µg/L | 124/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 106.03 µg/L 133% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 137 µg/L | 124/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 34.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 64.5 µg/L | 123/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.4885 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.3 µg/L | 82/126 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.2 µg/L | 67/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.296 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.26 µg/L | 54/126 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0023 mg/L 15% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2025 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.325 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.51 µg/L | 11/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
30 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about East Greenbush General W.D.
Is East Greenbush General W.D. tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in East Greenbush General W.D.'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in East Greenbush General W.D.'s water?
EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does East Greenbush General W.D. serve?
East Greenbush General W.D. reports serving 15,843 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has East Greenbush General W.D. had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 20 violations on file for East Greenbush General W.D., of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.