Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-10-01 → 2014-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-10-01 → 2014-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-10-01 → 2014-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-08-01 → 2006-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-08-01 → 2006-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-08-01 → 2006-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-07-01 → 2006-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-07-01 → 2006-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-07-01 → 2006-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1999-03-01 → 1999-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 3100 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2024 |
| Bromoform | 2.185 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.81 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 0.7090 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7200 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Combined Uranium | 20.66 µg/L 69% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 20.8 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2015 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.875 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 17.3405 pCi/L 116% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 18 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2015 |
| TTHM | 2.995 µg/L 3.7% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 1.875 µg/L 3.1% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Asbestos | 6.4 MFL 91% of the EPA limit 7 MFL | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Barium | 93 µg/L 4.7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2014 |
| Copper | 56 µg/L 4.3% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2013 |
| Lead | 6 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2013 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 3100 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2013 |
37 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Carmel Wd 7
Is Carmel Wd 7 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Carmel Wd 7's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Carmel Wd 7's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Carmel Wd 7 serve?
Carmel Wd 7 reports serving 300 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has Carmel Wd 7 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 11 violations on file for Carmel Wd 7, of which 9 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.