Tap WaterIndex

← New York

Tap water quality report

Scriba Wd (Oswego)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 42 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

42
contaminants tested
12
detected
9,044
people served
0
health-based violations
New York rankingsLead in New YorkPFAS in New York
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Oswego

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
8
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2012-06-01 → 2012-06-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2012-06-01 → 2012-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2012-02-01 → 2012-02-29
MR Monitoring Resolved 2012-02-01 → 2012-02-29
MR Monitoring Resolved 2012-02-01 → 2012-02-29
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-06-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-06-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-06-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
22.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L
56/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
67.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 76 µg/L
56/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
9.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
56/56 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
99.25 µg/L 124%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 112 µg/L
56/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
17.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
53/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
34 µg/L 57%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 35 µg/L
53/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
47/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
2.12 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
30/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
8.82 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.7 µg/L
17/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.025 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.5 µg/L
16/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 9/9 LCR 2022
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.33 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
3/56 SYR4 2012–2019
30 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
LAGOE, KELLY
Phone
315-343-3019
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Scriba Wd (Oswego)

Is Scriba Wd (Oswego) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Scriba Wd (Oswego)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Scriba Wd (Oswego)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Scriba Wd (Oswego) serve?

Scriba Wd (Oswego) reports serving 9,044 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Scriba Wd (Oswego) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 8 violations on file for Scriba Wd (Oswego), of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.