Is Clarendon Town Wds Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Orleans

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MR	Monitoring	Archived	2020-10-01 → 2020-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Archived	2020-10-01 → 2020-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Archived	2020-10-01 → 2020-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Archived	2020-10-01 → 2020-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2016-10-01
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2016-10-01
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2016-10-01
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2016-10-01
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2014-07-01
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2014-07-01

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).

Contaminant	Max	Detection rate	Period
Pfba	0.0191 µg/L	2/4	2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
TTHM	66.54 µg/L 83% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 72.3 µg/L	37/37	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	29.8 µg/L 50% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 30.4 µg/L	36/36	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane	17.64 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 21.7 µg/L	33/33	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	39.84 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 41.6 µg/L	33/33	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	8.22 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 9.52 µg/L	33/33	SYR4	2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	14.82 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 16.7 µg/L	30/33	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	12.7 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 14.5 µg/L	25/33	SYR4	2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	3.3195 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L	20/33	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromoform	0.8630 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 0.8800 µg/L	18/33	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	15/15	LCR	2024
Dibromoacetic Acid	1.671 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.77 µg/L	12/33	SYR4	2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid	10.91 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 11.6 µg/L	7/33	SYR4	2012–2019

29 contaminants tested, none detected

11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact: MOY, RICHARD
Phone: 585-638-6371

Frequently asked questions about Clarendon Town Wds

Is Clarendon Town Wds tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Clarendon Town Wds's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Clarendon Town Wds's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Clarendon Town Wds serve?

Clarendon Town Wds reports serving 2,482 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Clarendon Town Wds had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 19 violations on file for Clarendon Town Wds, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.