← New York

Tap water quality report

Woodbury Cons. W.D.

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 93 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

93
contaminants tested
12
detected
10,845
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Orange

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
219
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfpea 0.0048 µg/L 1/6 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
820 µg/L 8.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 910 µg/L
48/50 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
36.06 µg/L 45%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 44.4 µg/L
37/37 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
10.82 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.6 µg/L
29/36 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
49 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 58 µg/L
11/12 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0085 mg/L 57%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
10/10 LCR 2024
Lithium
21.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/6 UCMR-5 2024
Arsenic
1.52 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L
3/12 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Uranium
1.16365 µg/L 3.9%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.171 µg/L
2/7 SYR4 2016–2018
Fluoride
378 µg/L 9.5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 380 µg/L
2/12 SYR4 2012–2018
Toluene
1.2 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/25 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroethylene
0.5000 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/24 SYR4 2012–2019
81 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WOODBURY, MAYOR & VILLAGE BD
Phone
845-629-0201
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Woodbury Cons. W.D.

Is Woodbury Cons. W.D. tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Woodbury Cons. W.D.'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Woodbury Cons. W.D.'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Barium, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Woodbury Cons. W.D. serve?

Woodbury Cons. W.D. reports serving 10,845 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Woodbury Cons. W.D. had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 219 violations on file for Woodbury Cons. W.D., of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.