Tap WaterIndex

← New York

Tap water quality report

Harriman Village

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 93 contaminants and detected 20. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

93
contaminants tested
20
detected
5,000
people served
82
health-based violations
New York rankingsLead in New YorkPFAS in New York
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Orange

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

82
health-based violations
130
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfhxa 0.0037 µg/L 2/4 2025
PFOS 0.0075 µg/L 2/4 2025
Pfpea 0.0057 µg/L 2/4 2025
PFHXS 0.0036 µg/L 1/4 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Combined Uranium
44.6724 µg/L 149%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 68.987 µg/L
120/124 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1282 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1400 µg/L
70/110 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
26.834 pCi/L 179%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 36.67 pCi/L
67/88 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
4.9645 pCi/L 99%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 5.24 pCi/L
20/25 SYR4 2014–2019
Barium
132.5 µg/L 6.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 140 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2015
Fluoride
1210 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1420 µg/L
16/18 SYR4 2012–2015
TTHM
18.35 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 19 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
7.08 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.7 µg/L
13/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0023 mg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 10/10 LCR 2025
Trichloroethylene
2.13 µg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
10/75 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
1.7 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 8/16 SYR4 2012–2015
Selenium
4.925 µg/L 9.9%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
6/16 SYR4 2012–2015
Chromium
11.6 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
5/16 SYR4 2012–2015
Lithium
15.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 2/4 UCMR-5 2025
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1.1 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
 1/75 SYR4 2012–2019
Ethylbenzene
2.08 µg/L 0.3%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
 1/75 SYR4 2012–2019
73 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HARRIMAN, MAYOR & VILLAGE BD
Phone
845-783-4421
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Harriman Village

Is Harriman Village tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Harriman Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Harriman Village's water?

EPA monitoring detected Combined Uranium, Nitrate, Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Harriman Village serve?

Harriman Village reports serving 5,000 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Harriman Village had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 130 violations on file for Harriman Village, of which 82 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.