Is Bristol Wd #1 Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Ontario

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-01-01 → 2021-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-01-01 → 2021-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-01-01 → 2021-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2020-10-01 → 2020-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Bromodichloromethane	21 µg/L No EPA limit set	16/16	SYR4	2014–2019
Chloroform	86.5 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 88 µg/L	16/16	SYR4	2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane	3.95 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L	16/16	SYR4	2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	28 µg/L No EPA limit set	16/16	SYR4	2014–2019
TTHM	110 µg/L 138% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L worst single sample: 113 µg/L	16/16	SYR4	2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	52.25 µg/L 87% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 53 µg/L	16/16	SYR4	2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	25.9 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 28 µg/L	15/16	SYR4	2014–2019
Lead	0.0013 mg/L 8.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	8/8	LCR	2023
Monochloroacetic Acid	3.68 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L	5/16	SYR4	2014–2019

33 contaminants tested, none detected

11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformDibromoacetic AcidHfpo-DaMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact: FLETCHER, JAMES
Phone: 585-394-3300
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Bristol Wd #1

Is Bristol Wd #1 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 9 contaminants in Bristol Wd #1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Bristol Wd #1's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Bristol Wd #1 serve?

Bristol Wd #1 reports serving 203 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Bristol Wd #1 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 53 violations on file for Bristol Wd #1, of which 40 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.