← New York

Tap water quality report

Geneva Wd #8

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 12 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

12
contaminants tested
11
detected
400
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Ontario

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
2
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MON Monitoring Archived 2017-10-01 → 2017-10-31
MON Monitoring Archived 2017-10-01 → 2017-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
39.475 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
10 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.1 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
29.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.4 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
37.66 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
118.275 µg/L 148%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 120 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
30.85 µg/L 51%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 31.2 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
7.893 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
10.54 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.3 µg/L
23/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
11.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
23/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
5.184 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
15/24 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0034 mg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2023
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Monochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
VENUTI, MARK
Phone
315-789-3922
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Geneva Wd #8

Is Geneva Wd #8 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Geneva Wd #8's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Geneva Wd #8's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Geneva Wd #8 serve?

Geneva Wd #8 reports serving 400 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Geneva Wd #8 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 2 violations on file for Geneva Wd #8, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.