Tap WaterIndex

← New York

Tap water quality report

Tindall Corners Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 12 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

12
contaminants tested
11
detected
450
people served
8
health-based violations
New York rankingsLead in New YorkPFAS in New York
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Oneida

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
34
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
3.12 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
79.05 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 84.8 µg/L
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
12.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.3 µg/L
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
80.95 µg/L 101%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 86.1 µg/L
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
21.5 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 30.4 µg/L
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
12.43 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.5 µg/L
28/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 9/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0120 mg/L 80%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 3/3 LCR 2006
Dibromochloromethane
0.8055 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8100 µg/L
2/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.72 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
0.7000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/31 SYR4 2012–2019
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Bromoform

Utility contact

Contact
FLINT, THEODORE
Phone
315-798-4924
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Tindall Corners Water District

Is Tindall Corners Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Tindall Corners Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Tindall Corners Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Tindall Corners Water District serve?

Tindall Corners Water District reports serving 450 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Tindall Corners Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 34 violations on file for Tindall Corners Water District, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.