← New York

Tap water quality report

Mvwa - Mohawk Valley Water Authority

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 108 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

108
contaminants tested
16
detected
126,250
people served
29
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Oneida

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

29
health-based violations
43
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-12-01 → 2017-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-12-01 → 2017-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-12-01 → 2017-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-09-01 → 2016-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-09-01 → 2016-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-09-01 → 2016-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-09-01 → 1993-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-05-01 → 1993-05-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
84.87 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 93.9 µg/L
250/250 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
16.44 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.3 µg/L
250/250 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
27.66 µg/L 46%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 40 µg/L
250/250 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
87.02 µg/L 109%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 95.7 µg/L
249/249 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
2.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
243/250 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
13.01 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
239/250 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
800 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 810 µg/L
73/74 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.235 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
34/241 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
0.5000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
24/242 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
387 µg/L 3.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 390 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0120 mg/L 80%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2025
Nitrate-Nitrite
379 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 390 µg/L
12/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.185 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
10/250 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
8.715 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.1 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
0.0100 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
0.6600 pCi/L 4.4%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
92 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
TANGORRA, PHILIP
Phone
315-792-0319
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Mvwa - Mohawk Valley Water Authority

Is Mvwa - Mohawk Valley Water Authority tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Mvwa - Mohawk Valley Water Authority's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Mvwa - Mohawk Valley Water Authority's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Mvwa - Mohawk Valley Water Authority serve?

Mvwa - Mohawk Valley Water Authority reports serving 126,250 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Mvwa - Mohawk Valley Water Authority had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 43 violations on file for Mvwa - Mohawk Valley Water Authority, of which 29 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.