← New York

Tap water quality report

Ocfs Industry Residential Center

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
11
detected
171
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
State government
Counties served
Monroe

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
20
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-07-01 → 2023-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-07-01 → 2023-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-07-01 → 2023-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-07-01 → 2023-07-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2021-05-01 → 2021-05-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2021-05-01 → 2021-05-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2021-05-01 → 2021-05-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2021-05-01 → 2021-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
689.5 µg/L 53%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 970 µg/L
18/18 SYR4 2017–2019
Lead
0.0016 mg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
18/18 LCR 2025
Lead
23.9 µg/L 159%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 26 µg/L
15/17 SYR4 2017–2019
Bromodichloromethane
23.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24 µg/L
11/11 SYR4 2016–2019
Chloroform
111 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 130 µg/L
11/11 SYR4 2016–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L
11/11 SYR4 2016–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
18.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26 µg/L
11/11 SYR4 2016–2019
TTHM
140.9 µg/L 176%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 158 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2016–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
32.7 µg/L 55%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 39 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2016–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
17.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
9/11 SYR4 2016–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/11 SYR4 2016–2019
3 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic AcidMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
YALAJU, ALFRED
Phone
518-408-3993
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Ocfs Industry Residential Center

Is Ocfs Industry Residential Center tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Ocfs Industry Residential Center's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ocfs Industry Residential Center's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ocfs Industry Residential Center serve?

Ocfs Industry Residential Center reports serving 171 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Ocfs Industry Residential Center had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 20 violations on file for Ocfs Industry Residential Center, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.