← Connecticut

Tap water quality report

Vedder Park

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 71 contaminants and detected 6. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

71
contaminants tested
6
detected
27
people served
3
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Greene

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
62
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2015-06-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2015-06-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2015-06-01
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-05-01 → 2024-05-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-05-01 → 2024-05-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-05-01 → 2024-05-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2021-11-01 → 2021-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2021-11-01 → 2021-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2021-11-01 → 2021-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2021-01-01 → 2021-01-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
700 µg/L 7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
10/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0040 mg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2024
Barium
73.75 µg/L 3.7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 74 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
1.95 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2016
Dibromoacetic Acid
2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2015
TTHM
1.2 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2015–2016
65 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GRTS RE, LLC

Frequently asked questions about Vedder Park

Is Vedder Park tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 6 contaminants in Vedder Park's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Vedder Park's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Barium, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Vedder Park serve?

Vedder Park reports serving 27 people in Connecticut, per its EPA record.

Has Vedder Park had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 62 violations on file for Vedder Park, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.