Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Archived | 1993-08-01 → 1993-08-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-01-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-01-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-02-01 → 2021-02-28 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-02-01 → 2021-02-28 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-02-01 → 2021-02-28 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2009-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2004-12-01 → 2004-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2004-12-01 → 2004-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 66.15 µg/L 83% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 76.6 µg/L | 31/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 62.45 µg/L 104% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 77.1 µg/L | 31/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 43.625 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 65 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 23.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 23 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 6.42 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.4 µg/L | 15/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2023 |
| Nitrate | 503 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 18.835 µg/L 0.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 20.2 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.24 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 5/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 7.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8 µg/L | 3/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Antimony, Total | 2.61 µg/L 44% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 0.9000 µg/L 9% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Cyanide | 10 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 7.9 µg/L 7.9% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.2800 pCi/L 5.6% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Selenium | 3 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
52 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Coxsackie Correctional Facility
Is Coxsackie Correctional Facility tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Coxsackie Correctional Facility's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Coxsackie Correctional Facility's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Coxsackie Correctional Facility serve?
Coxsackie Correctional Facility reports serving 2,000 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has Coxsackie Correctional Facility had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 37 violations on file for Coxsackie Correctional Facility, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.