Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-01-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-01-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-01-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-06-01 → 2010-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-06-01 → 2010-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-06-01 → 2010-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-06-01 → 2010-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2009-01-01 → 2009-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2009-01-01 → 2009-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2009-01-01 → 2009-12-31 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6:2 Fts | 0.0700 µg/L | 1/4 | 2023 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 17.06 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.2 µg/L | 125/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 32.88 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 50.1 µg/L | 125/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 10.98 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.6 µg/L | 125/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 61.73 µg/L 77% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 94.1 µg/L | 120/120 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 18.0125 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 119 µg/L | 120/120 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 4.4525 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.4 µg/L | 116/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.609 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L | 112/120 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 10.055 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.9 µg/L | 110/120 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 5.82 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.9 µg/L | 89/120 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 21/21 | LCR | 2025 |
| Fluoride | 800 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 11/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 890 µg/L 8.9% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 15.75 µg/L 0.8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 16 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 87.8625 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 115 µg/L | 6/119 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 876.1 µg/L 8.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 890 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2014 |
| Lithium | 12.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/4 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Arsenic | 0.3500 µg/L 3.5% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 9.04 µg/L 9% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.44 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/120 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
83 contaminants tested, none detected
Frequently asked questions about Batavia City
Is Batavia City tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Batavia City's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Batavia City's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Batavia City serve?
Batavia City reports serving 15,475 people, per its EPA record.
Has Batavia City had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 31 violations on file for Batavia City, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.