← New York

Tap water quality report

Collins/Gowanda Correctional Facility

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 102 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

102
contaminants tested
24
detected
1,512
people served
65
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
State government
Counties served
Erie

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

65
health-based violations
70
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
76.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 93 µg/L
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
17 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25 µg/L
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
91.5 µg/L 114%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 110 µg/L
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
72 µg/L 120%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 82.94 µg/L
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
28.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31 µg/L
31/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
40.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 47 µg/L
30/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
7.48 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L
22/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
10.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
16/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0020 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2024
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.91 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L
14/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
850 µg/L 8.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
12/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
4.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L
11/31 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
714 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 771 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2019
Fluoride
786.5 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 890 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2019
Arsenic
3.56 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2014–2019
Chromium
2.0985 µg/L 2.1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2014–2019
2,4-D
0.1500 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 70 µg/L
1/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.6600 pCi/L 13%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/3 SYR4 2015–2018
Combined Uranium
1.06 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
0.9000 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
1.41 pCi/L 9.4%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Picloram
45 µg/L 9%
of the EPA limit 500 µg/L
1/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Thallium, Total
0.0370 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2014–2019
78 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WENDEL, KARL TED
Phone
716-532-4588
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Collins/Gowanda Correctional Facility

Is Collins/Gowanda Correctional Facility tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Collins/Gowanda Correctional Facility's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Collins/Gowanda Correctional Facility's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Collins/Gowanda Correctional Facility serve?

Collins/Gowanda Correctional Facility reports serving 1,512 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Collins/Gowanda Correctional Facility had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 70 violations on file for Collins/Gowanda Correctional Facility, of which 65 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.