Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-06-01 → 2011-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-06-01 → 2011-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-06-01 → 2011-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-06-01 → 2011-06-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-10-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-10-01 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-07-01 → 1996-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-07-01 → 1996-07-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 13.9842 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.993 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 52.6016 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 56.568 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.6652 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.93 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 73.701 µg/L 92% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 77.637 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 34.52 µg/L 58% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 35 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.7525 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L | 16/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 8.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.1 µg/L | 16/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 14.86 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.9 µg/L | 14/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00050 mg/L 3.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 12.525 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 12/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 8.912 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.92 µg/L | 9/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.7192 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7500 µg/L | 4/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Evans Water District
Is Evans Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Evans Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Evans Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Evans Water District serve?
Evans Water District reports serving 160 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has Evans Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 28 violations on file for Evans Water District, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.