Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 69.475 µg/L 87% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 85.1 µg/L | 376/376 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 17.44 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.9 µg/L | 373/373 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 45.135 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 52.7 µg/L | 372/372 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 7.778 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.7 µg/L | 372/372 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 38.451 µg/L 64% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 68.8 µg/L | 368/368 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 18.285 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26 µg/L | 364/364 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 21 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40.2 µg/L | 361/364 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.958 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L | 193/362 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L | 93/376 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.89 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.3 µg/L | 91/368 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 375 µg/L 3.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 540 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 24.75 µg/L 1.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 27 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0060 mg/L 40% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 7.405 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.5 µg/L | 12/368 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 911.45 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 930 µg/L | 8/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 1.066 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 5/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.235 pCi/L 25% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.25 pCi/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.6440 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.7000 µg/L | 3/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | 1.185 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L | 2/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 1.3 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 2/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Mercury | 0.0658 µg/L 3.3% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.0660 µg/L | 2/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 1.1 µg/L 2.2% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 2/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Atrazine | 0.0700 µg/L 2.3% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L | 1/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Cadmium | 0.0200 µg/L 0.4% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Thallium, Total | 0.0300 µg/L 1.5% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
78 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Ecwa Direct
Is Ecwa Direct tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 25 contaminants in Ecwa Direct's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Ecwa Direct's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Ecwa Direct serve?
Ecwa Direct reports serving 313,380 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has Ecwa Direct had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 4 violations on file for Ecwa Direct, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.