Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-05-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-05-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-05-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-12-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Archived | 2017-09-01 → 2017-09-30 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0067 µg/L | 2/4 | 2023 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 16.095 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.3 µg/L | 62/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 49.63 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 51.6 µg/L | 62/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.6075 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.67 µg/L | 62/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 70.985 µg/L 89% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 74.6 µg/L | 62/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 35.985 µg/L 60% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 101.7 µg/L | 62/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 16.13 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.5 µg/L | 59/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 20.66 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 92 µg/L | 53/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.6675 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.24 µg/L | 42/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.9835 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.6 µg/L | 42/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.6235 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.6300 µg/L | 14/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 3.5145 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.64 µg/L | 14/62 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0420 mg/L 280% above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L | 11/11 | LCR | 2025 |
29 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about East Aurora Village
Is East Aurora Village tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in East Aurora Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in East Aurora Village's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does East Aurora Village serve?
East Aurora Village reports serving 6,610 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has East Aurora Village had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 22 violations on file for East Aurora Village, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 5 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.