Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2002-07-01 → 2002-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2002-07-01 → 2002-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1994-11-01 → 1994-11-30 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloroform | 33 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 50 µg/L | 363/363 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 13 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22 µg/L | 363/364 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 51 µg/L 64% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 70 µg/L | 363/363 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 28 µg/L 47% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 37 µg/L | 363/363 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 5.695 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.5 µg/L | 362/363 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 11 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 362/364 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 14 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L | 360/360 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 4.725 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.7 µg/L | 56/366 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7 µg/L | 55/366 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.705 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L | 40/366 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 357 µg/L 3.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 360 µg/L | 24/24 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0040 mg/L 27% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2025 |
| Fluoride | 927 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 940 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 23 µg/L 1.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 13/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.5845 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.5900 µg/L | 12/366 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 5.1 µg/L 5.1% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L | 2/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 333.5 µg/L 3.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 340 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Copper | 15 µg/L 1.2% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
86 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Buffalo Water Authority
Is Buffalo Water Authority tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Buffalo Water Authority's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Buffalo Water Authority's water?
EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Buffalo Water Authority serve?
Buffalo Water Authority reports serving 276,000 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has Buffalo Water Authority had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 103 violations on file for Buffalo Water Authority, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.