Is Shenandoah Road Wd Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: GWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Dutchess

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2017-07-18
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2017-07-18
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2017-07-18
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2015-07-01
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2015-07-01
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2013-01-01 → 2013-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2013-01-01 → 2013-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2013-01-01 → 2013-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2013-01-01 → 2013-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2013-01-01 → 2013-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Lead	0.0084 mg/L 56% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	9/9	LCR	2025
Bromodichloromethane	12.925 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 13.1 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	58.935 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 59.6 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	6.593 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 7.02 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	13.745 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 14.2 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	79.02 µg/L 99% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 79.3 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	19.42 µg/L 32% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 20.4 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	8.365 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 8.4 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromoform	1.874 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2 µg/L	5/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	1.02 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/8	SYR4	2012–2019

2 contaminants tested, none detected

Monobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact: TOWN OF EAST FISHKILL
Phone: 845-221-4303
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Shenandoah Road Wd

Is Shenandoah Road Wd tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Shenandoah Road Wd's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Shenandoah Road Wd's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Shenandoah Road Wd serve?

Shenandoah Road Wd reports serving 400 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Shenandoah Road Wd had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 11 violations on file for Shenandoah Road Wd, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.