Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 3840 µg/L 38% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 12/28 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00016 mg/L 1.1% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 11/11 | LCR | 2026 |
| Barium | 161.4 µg/L 8.1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 174 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 2.67 pCi/L 53% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.7 pCi/L | 6/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Arsenic | 1.295 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L | 4/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chromium | 12.755 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.8 µg/L | 4/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 14.27 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.4 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 26.475 µg/L 44% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 30 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 7.899 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.96 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chloroform | 29.276 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31.9 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 7.788 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.02 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 5.376 pCi/L 36% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 5.47 pCi/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 40.646 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 42.6 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromoform | 2.0965 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Uranium | 2.28829 µg/L 7.6% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.29609 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.425 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Selenium | 2.995 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 2/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 13.01 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.6 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lithium | 15.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/2 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
58 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Greenfield Water District
Is Greenfield Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Greenfield Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Greenfield Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Barium, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Arsenic, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Greenfield Water District serve?
Greenfield Water District reports serving 1,050 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has Greenfield Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 223 violations on file for Greenfield Water District, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.