Tap WaterIndex

← New York

Tap water quality report

Chenango Consolidated Wd #1

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 100 contaminants and detected 25. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

100
contaminants tested
25
detected
9,200
people served
16
health-based violations
New York rankingsLead in New YorkPFAS in New York
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Broome

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

16
health-based violations
22
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-10-01 → 2012-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-10-01 → 2012-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-10-01 → 2012-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-10-01 → 2011-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-10-01 → 2011-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-10-01 → 2011-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-10-01 → 2011-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-09-01 → 2003-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-09-01 → 2003-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-09-01 → 2003-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0053 µg/L 3/12 2025
Pfhxa 0.0077 µg/L 2/12 2025
PFOA 0.0063 µg/L 2/12 2025
Pfpea 0.0084 µg/L 2/12 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
3800 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4890 µg/L
82/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0020 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 42/42 LCR 2026
Dibromochloromethane
7.126 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.8 µg/L
25/36 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
28.486 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 38.9 µg/L
25/36 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
10.002 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.6 µg/L
25/36 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
14.59 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.8 µg/L
23/36 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
5.4375 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.05 µg/L
20/36 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.915 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L
20/36 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
1234 µg/L 62%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1370 µg/L
17/19 SYR4 2012–2018
Chloroform
15.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.1 µg/L
16/36 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.325 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
16/36 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.03995 pCi/L 21%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.125 pCi/L
8/8 SYR4 2013–2017
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.758 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
8/36 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.399 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L
7/36 SYR4 2013–2019
Lithium
123 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 6/12 UCMR-5 2025
Monochloroacetic Acid
5.375 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L
4/36 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
2.3985 µg/L 2.4%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
2/19 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
177.5 µg/L 4.4%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 180 µg/L
2/19 SYR4 2012–2018
Antimony, Total
3.8 µg/L 63%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
 1/19 SYR4 2012–2018
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1.6 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
 1/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
6.98 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 1/19 SYR4 2012–2018
75 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BURDEN, GREG
Phone
607-648-4809
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Chenango Consolidated Wd #1

Is Chenango Consolidated Wd #1 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 25 contaminants in Chenango Consolidated Wd #1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Chenango Consolidated Wd #1's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Chenango Consolidated Wd #1 serve?

Chenango Consolidated Wd #1 reports serving 9,200 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Chenango Consolidated Wd #1 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 22 violations on file for Chenango Consolidated Wd #1, of which 16 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.