Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-11-01 → 2013-11-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-11-01 → 2013-11-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-11-01 → 2013-11-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-11-01 → 2013-11-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-08-01 → 2011-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-08-01 → 2011-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-08-01 → 2011-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-08-01 → 2011-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-04-01 → 2011-04-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-04-01 → 2011-04-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 26.85 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35 µg/L | 224/225 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 42.595 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 98.4 µg/L | 224/225 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 14.915 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.4 µg/L | 218/225 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 247.2 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 600 µg/L | 212/219 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 6.4765 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.9 µg/L | 152/215 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 89.91 µg/L 112% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 105.9 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 40.48 µg/L 67% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 70.7 µg/L | 125/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 19.32 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 43.5 µg/L | 125/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 20.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.2 µg/L | 121/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 11.375 µg/L 76% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 90.2 µg/L | 63/217 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.45 µg/L | 41/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 24/24 | LCR | 2025 |
| Barium | 183.8 µg/L 9.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 229 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 12.22 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.3 µg/L | 9/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 4.2105 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.97 µg/L | 8/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 13.795 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.4 µg/L | 8/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1126 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1140 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 1100 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 940 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1000 µg/L | 5/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | 0.8675 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.9150 µg/L | 4/97 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 1.1265 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.19 µg/L | 3/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Cadmium | 0.9176 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.9470 µg/L | 2/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 15.847 µg/L 32% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.5 µg/L | 2/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Beryllium, Total | 2.21 µg/L 55% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroethylene | 0.3270 µg/L 6.5% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/97 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
55 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Rahway Water Department
Is Rahway Water Department tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 30 contaminants in Rahway Water Department's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Rahway Water Department's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Copper, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Rahway Water Department serve?
Rahway Water Department reports serving 27,300 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.
Has Rahway Water Department had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 65 violations on file for Rahway Water Department, of which 36 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.