← New Jersey

Tap water quality report

Rahway Water Department

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 85 contaminants and detected 30. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

85
contaminants tested
30
detected
27,300
people served
36
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Union

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

36
health-based violations
65
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-11-01 → 2013-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-11-01 → 2013-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-11-01 → 2013-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2013-11-01 → 2013-11-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2011-08-01 → 2011-08-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2011-08-01 → 2011-08-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2011-08-01 → 2011-08-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2011-08-01 → 2011-08-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2011-04-01 → 2011-04-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2011-04-01 → 2011-04-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0059 µg/L 1/4 2023
Pfhxa 0.0041 µg/L 1/4 2023
PFOA 0.0069 µg/L 1/4 2023
Pfpea 0.0054 µg/L 1/4 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
26.85 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35 µg/L
224/225 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
42.595 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 98.4 µg/L
224/225 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
14.915 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.4 µg/L
218/225 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
247.2 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 600 µg/L
212/219 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
6.4765 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.9 µg/L
152/215 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
89.91 µg/L 112%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 105.9 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
40.48 µg/L 67%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 70.7 µg/L
125/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
19.32 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 43.5 µg/L
125/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
20.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.2 µg/L
121/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
11.375 µg/L 76%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 90.2 µg/L
63/217 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.45 µg/L
41/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
24/24 LCR 2025
Barium
183.8 µg/L 9.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 229 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
12.22 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.3 µg/L
9/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
4.2105 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.97 µg/L
8/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
13.795 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.4 µg/L
8/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1126 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1140 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1100 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
940 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1000 µg/L
5/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Tetrachloroethylene
0.8675 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.9150 µg/L
4/97 SYR4 2012–2019
Antimony, Total
1.1265 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.19 µg/L
3/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Cadmium
0.9176 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.9470 µg/L
2/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
15.847 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.5 µg/L
2/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Beryllium, Total
2.21 µg/L 55%
of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
1/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroethylene
0.3270 µg/L 6.5%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/97 SYR4 2012–2019
55 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAsbestosBenzeneChlorobenzeneCyanideCarbon TetrachlorideCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHfpo-DaMercuryNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitritePFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaStyreneThallium, TotalTolueneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
LEE, DANIEL
Phone
732-827-2081
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Rahway Water Department

Is Rahway Water Department tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 30 contaminants in Rahway Water Department's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Rahway Water Department's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Copper, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Rahway Water Department serve?

Rahway Water Department reports serving 27,300 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.

Has Rahway Water Department had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 65 violations on file for Rahway Water Department, of which 36 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.