Is Veolia Water New Jersey Sussex Hills Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Sussex

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2017-01-01 → 2017-03-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2004-01-01 → 2004-03-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2004-01-01 → 2004-03-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2004-01-01 → 2004-03-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2004-01-01 → 2004-03-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2004-01-01 → 2004-03-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2004-01-01 → 2004-03-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2004-01-01 → 2004-03-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2004-01-01 → 2004-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)	3.137 pCi/L 63% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L worst single sample: 4 pCi/L	48/62	SYR4	2012–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U	8.775 pCi/L 59% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L worst single sample: 16.2 pCi/L	46/62	SYR4	2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite	3365 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 3480 µg/L	32/32	SYR4	2012–2019
Combined Uranium	4.24278 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L worst single sample: 5.5428 µg/L	28/62	SYR4	2012–2019
Copper	133 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 240 µg/L	21/24	SYR4	2012–2018
Bromodichloromethane	4.88 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 5.9 µg/L	18/18	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	9.865 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 12.5 µg/L	18/18	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	4.8685 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 6.39 µg/L	18/18	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	0.0090 mg/L 60% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	14/14	LCR	2024
Lead	4.2495 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 5.27 µg/L	14/22	SYR4	2012–2018
Nitrate	3240 µg/L 32% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L	12/12	SYR4	2013–2019
Bromoform	3.33 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.63 µg/L	11/15	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	21.086 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 23.3 µg/L	10/10	SYR4	2012–2019
Barium	36.01 µg/L 1.8% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 36.6 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2012–2018
Chromium	9.57 µg/L 9.6% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L worst single sample: 10 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2012–2018
Fluoride	207.5 µg/L 5.2% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 210 µg/L	2/3	SYR4	2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid	1.1 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/10	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	4.7 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/10	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	5.8 µg/L 9.7% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L	1/10	SYR4	2012–2019

36 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: DECARLO, LYNN MARIE
Phone: 201-599-6020

Frequently asked questions about Veolia Water New Jersey Sussex Hills

Is Veolia Water New Jersey Sussex Hills tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Veolia Water New Jersey Sussex Hills's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Veolia Water New Jersey Sussex Hills's water?

EPA monitoring detected Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U, Nitrate-Nitrite, Combined Uranium, Copper, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Veolia Water New Jersey Sussex Hills serve?

Veolia Water New Jersey Sussex Hills reports serving 168 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.

Has Veolia Water New Jersey Sussex Hills had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 55 violations on file for Veolia Water New Jersey Sussex Hills, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.