Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-09-01 → 2013-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-10-01 → 1999-12-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloroform | 11.695 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.3 µg/L | 32/35 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 1861.5 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2120 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 6.4635 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.7 µg/L | 30/35 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.435 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.53 µg/L | 23/35 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0100 mg/L 67% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 19/19 | LCR | 2025 |
| Copper | 461.8 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 606 µg/L | 15/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 31.38 µg/L 39% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 49.3 µg/L | 15/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 8.485 µg/L 57% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.5 µg/L | 14/15 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 10.15 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.2 µg/L | 6/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 2056 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2080 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Bromoform | 1.634 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.79 µg/L | 4/35 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.264 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L | 4/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 3.904 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 4/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.585 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 4/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Toluene | 7.265 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.52 µg/L | 3/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 1.4044 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.44 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Barium | 327.55 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 334 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Cadmium | 0.0717 µg/L 1.4% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.0720 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 5.415 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L | 2/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Beryllium, Total | 0.0360 µg/L 0.9% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chromium | 0.7460 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Selenium | 2.59 µg/L 5.2% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
30 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Saint Pauls Abbey
Is Saint Pauls Abbey tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Saint Pauls Abbey's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Saint Pauls Abbey's water?
EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Saint Pauls Abbey serve?
Saint Pauls Abbey reports serving 530 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.
Has Saint Pauls Abbey had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 162 violations on file for Saint Pauls Abbey, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.