Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2023-01-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2023-01-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-08-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-08-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-06-11 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-06-11 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 2100 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0028 mg/L 19% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2026 |
| Copper | 83.42 µg/L 6.4% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 96.2 µg/L | 13/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 4.885 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 0.8040 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.14 µg/L | 9/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 0.9640 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.14 µg/L | 9/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 0.6745 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9300 µg/L | 8/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.06 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 5/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 1.785 µg/L 2.2% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L | 4/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 46.95 µg/L 2.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 47.3 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Arsenic | 0.4935 µg/L 4.9% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.5000 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Selenium | 1.2755 µg/L 2.6% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Cadmium | 0.0300 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chromium | 0.6900 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 0.3800 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Mercury | 0.0750 µg/L 3.8% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 0.3800 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
33 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Mohawk Meadows
Is Mohawk Meadows tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Mohawk Meadows's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Mohawk Meadows's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Mohawk Meadows serve?
Mohawk Meadows reports serving 250 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.
Has Mohawk Meadows had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 331 violations on file for Mohawk Meadows, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 4 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.