Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-09-01 → 2011-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-09-01 → 2011-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-09-01 → 2011-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-09-01 → 2011-09-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-07-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 3740 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 18/18 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Copper | 201.4 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 275 µg/L | 17/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromoform | 10.725 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.7 µg/L | 16/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.079 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.94 µg/L | 15/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 2.582 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.25 µg/L | 13/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 13.084 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.21 µg/L | 13/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.934 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.21 µg/L | 12/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0038 mg/L 25% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2024 |
| Lead | 15.4 µg/L 103% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 21.4 µg/L | 11/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.75 µg/L | 7/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 3.6 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.75 µg/L | 7/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 19.12 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 20.5 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Arsenic | 2.204 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chromium | 10.087 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.4 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 4.5115 pCi/L 90% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 4.67 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 0.9165 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9200 µg/L | 2/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 10.055 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.5 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.0500 µg/L 0.8% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Thallium, Total | 0.1200 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 2 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
31 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Rolling Hills Condminium Association
Is Rolling Hills Condminium Association tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Rolling Hills Condminium Association's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Rolling Hills Condminium Association's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Rolling Hills Condminium Association serve?
Rolling Hills Condminium Association reports serving 240 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.
Has Rolling Hills Condminium Association had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 85 violations on file for Rolling Hills Condminium Association, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.