Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-08-01 → 2025-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-08-01 → 2025-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-08-01 → 2025-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-08-01 → 2025-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-12-31 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFOA | 0.0079 µg/L | 4/4 | 2024 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 16.29 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.1 µg/L | 63/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 72.09 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 83.8 µg/L | 63/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 87.79 µg/L 110% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 104 µg/L | 63/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.0235 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.62 µg/L | 62/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 189.71 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1460 µg/L | 59/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 21.46 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.4 µg/L | 59/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 43.84 µg/L 73% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 57.4 µg/L | 59/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 27.22 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 42.7 µg/L | 52/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 19.6 µg/L 131% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 32.9 µg/L | 29/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 22/22 | LCR | 2026 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L | 6/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.6267 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.6560 µg/L | 3/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
30 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Bloomingdale Water Dept
Is Bloomingdale Water Dept tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Bloomingdale Water Dept's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Bloomingdale Water Dept's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Copper, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Bloomingdale Water Dept serve?
Bloomingdale Water Dept reports serving 7,742 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.
Has Bloomingdale Water Dept had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 56 violations on file for Bloomingdale Water Dept, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.