← New Jersey

Tap water quality report

Cedar Glen West Water Co

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 54 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

54
contaminants tested
18
detected
1,300
people served
18
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Ocean

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

18
health-based violations
90
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
5370 µg/L 54%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 10500 µg/L
114/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
400 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 6000 µg/L
61/150 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
21 µg/L 140%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 100 µg/L
56/142 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
5.87 pCi/L 117%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 35.2 pCi/L
43/43 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0044 mg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
32/32 LCR 2025
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
48.2 pCi/L 321%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 60.3 pCi/L
21/21 SYR4 2013–2018
Chloroform
6.394 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.01 µg/L
17/18 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
15.862 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.31 µg/L
17/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
13.28 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.4 µg/L
17/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
6.059 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.39 µg/L
15/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.7365 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.86 µg/L
14/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
5.124 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.73 µg/L
13/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.824 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.86 µg/L
13/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
7.152 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.24 µg/L
13/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.625 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
12/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
0.9050 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.01 µg/L
8/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.685 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
7/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
466 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 500 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2012–2018
36 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneFluorideMercuryNitriteSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SPEICHERT, WILLIAM
Phone
732-657-5525

Frequently asked questions about Cedar Glen West Water Co

Is Cedar Glen West Water Co tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Cedar Glen West Water Co's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Cedar Glen West Water Co's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Cedar Glen West Water Co serve?

Cedar Glen West Water Co reports serving 1,300 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.

Has Cedar Glen West Water Co had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 90 violations on file for Cedar Glen West Water Co, of which 18 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.