Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-01-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | 0.0049 mg/L 33% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 30/30 | LCR | 2026 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.8745 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.92 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 1.267 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.28 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.4705 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.75 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 6.152 µg/L 7.7% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.62 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.9150 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9700 µg/L | 12/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 4.55 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 10/120 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 1500 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 10/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 24.4205 µg/L 41% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 35.9 µg/L | 10/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.717 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.74 µg/L | 8/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 7.21 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.32 µg/L | 7/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 15.92 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.2 µg/L | 6/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 80 µg/L 6.2% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 90 µg/L | 5/126 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 4.5685 pCi/L 91% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 5.11 pCi/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 4.598 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.98 µg/L | 3/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 242.5 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 250 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 3.55 pCi/L 24% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 0.8100 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
34 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Cedar Glen Lakes Water C
Is Cedar Glen Lakes Water C tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Cedar Glen Lakes Water C's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Cedar Glen Lakes Water C's water?
EPA monitoring detected Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Cedar Glen Lakes Water C serve?
Cedar Glen Lakes Water C reports serving 2,126 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.
Has Cedar Glen Lakes Water C had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 41 violations on file for Cedar Glen Lakes Water C, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.