Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-01-01 → 2019-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 3020 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3540 µg/L | 122/122 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 51.084 µg/L 2.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 59.4 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Copper | 254.31 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 266 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.69 µg/L | 15/100 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 8.379 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.5 µg/L | 15/100 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Chromium | 1.272 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.47 µg/L | 12/15 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 136.5 µg/L 3.4% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L | 10/15 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Chloroform | 2.88755 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.15 µg/L | 8/122 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 1.946 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 5/100 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| TTHM | 5.3645 µg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.02 µg/L | 4/100 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| 1,1,1-Trichloroethane | 0.1660 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.1700 µg/L | 3/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 0.5445 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.5450 µg/L | 3/122 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Selenium | 0.9040 µg/L 1.8% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.9100 µg/L | 3/15 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.8045 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.87 µg/L | 2/122 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.3786 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.398 µg/L | 2/100 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Arsenic | 0.5100 µg/L 5.1% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/15 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.19 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/100 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 6.66 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/100 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Trichloroethylene | 0.0600 µg/L 1.2% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
30 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Morris County Mua
Is Morris County Mua tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Morris County Mua's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Morris County Mua's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Barium, Copper, Dichloroacetic Acid, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Morris County Mua serve?
Morris County Mua reports serving 0 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.
Has Morris County Mua had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 175 violations on file for Morris County Mua, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.