← New Jersey

Tap water quality report

Netcong Water Dept

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 99 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

99
contaminants tested
23
detected
3,342
people served
3
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Morris

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

3
health-based violations
128
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-04-01 → 2013-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-04-01 → 2013-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-04-01 → 2013-04-30
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOA 0.0086 µg/L 6/6 2023
Pfhxa 0.0048 µg/L 4/6 2023
PFOS 0.0059 µg/L 4/6 2023
Pfpea 0.0059 µg/L 4/6 2023
PFHXS 0.0061 µg/L 2/6 2023
Pfhpa 0.0033 µg/L 1/6 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate-Nitrite
2460 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2540 µg/L
48/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
412.6 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 596 µg/L
33/39 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromochloromethane
3.405 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
18/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
2.58 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
17/30 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
8.04 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 9 µg/L
17/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
5 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 8 µg/L
16/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0027 mg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2024
Fluoride
200 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
14/18 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromodichloromethane
1.845 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
12/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
73.2 µg/L 3.7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 74 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
8.436 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.4 µg/L
9/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
12.216 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.7 µg/L
9/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
2 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
6/9 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.364 pCi/L 47%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.58 pCi/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2015
Chloroform
0.7000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
4.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/18 SYR4 2012–2019
76 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HESS, THIMOTHY
Phone
973-908-4351

Frequently asked questions about Netcong Water Dept

Is Netcong Water Dept tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Netcong Water Dept's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Netcong Water Dept's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate-Nitrite, Copper, Dibromochloromethane, Bromoform, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Netcong Water Dept serve?

Netcong Water Dept reports serving 3,342 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.

Has Netcong Water Dept had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 128 violations on file for Netcong Water Dept, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.