← New Jersey

Tap water quality report

Dover Water Commission

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 83 contaminants and detected 31. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

83
contaminants tested
31
detected
27,806
people served
23
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Morris

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

23
health-based violations
549
violations on file
5
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-12-01 → 2013-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-12-01 → 2013-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-12-01 → 2013-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-09-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-09-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-09-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-09-01 → 2007-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-06-01 → 2006-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-06-01 → 2006-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-06-01 → 2006-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfhxa 0.0052 µg/L 4/4 2024
PFHXS 0.0056 µg/L 4/4 2024
PFOA 0.0120 µg/L 4/4 2024
PFOS 0.0081 µg/L 4/4 2024
Pfpea 0.0068 µg/L 4/4 2024
Pfba 0.0057 µg/L 1/4 2024
PFBS 0.0036 µg/L 1/4 2024
Pfhpa 0.0032 µg/L 1/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Dibromochloromethane
6.652 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.1 µg/L
164/178 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
7.08 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.47 µg/L
161/178 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
3.0615 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.07 µg/L
122/178 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
16.834 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 24 µg/L
114/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
8.44 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
108/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.66 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.98 µg/L
105/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
1.256 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L
39/178 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
161.2 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 337 µg/L
32/95 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate
2453 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3410 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
17.9 µg/L 119%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 27.2 µg/L
21/91 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.9395 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.73 µg/L
18/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0028 mg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
16/16 LCR 2024
Dichloroacetic Acid
3.822 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.74 µg/L
15/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
13.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.7 µg/L
11/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
2.4855 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.52 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.476 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.53 µg/L
4/114 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
754.3 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 765 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Mercury
0.0537 µg/L 2.7%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.0540 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Beryllium, Total
0.1110 µg/L 2.8%
of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.72 pCi/L 54%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/3 SYR4 2014–2017
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
3.35 pCi/L 22%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2014
Selenium
9.99 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Thallium, Total
0.6420 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2014–2017
52 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosBenzeneChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideCombined UraniumDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneFluorideHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaStyreneTetrachloroethyleneTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ACEVEDO, LUIS M
Phone
973-366-2200

Frequently asked questions about Dover Water Commission

Is Dover Water Commission tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 31 contaminants in Dover Water Commission's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Dover Water Commission's water?

EPA monitoring detected Dibromochloromethane, Bromoform, Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Dover Water Commission serve?

Dover Water Commission reports serving 27,806 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.

Has Dover Water Commission had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 549 violations on file for Dover Water Commission, of which 23 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 5 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.