← New Jersey

Tap water quality report

South River W Dept

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 82 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

82
contaminants tested
24
detected
16,000
people served
13
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Middlesex

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

13
health-based violations
96
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Archived 2025-02-01 → 2025-02-28
TT Health-based Archived 2025-02-01 → 2025-02-28
TT Health-based Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31
TT Health-based Archived 2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-08-01 → 2023-08-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-01-01 → 2004-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOA 0.0076 µg/L 3/6 2024
PFOS 0.0041 µg/L 2/6 2024
Pfba 0.0052 µg/L 1/6 2024
Pfhxa 0.0084 µg/L 1/6 2024
Pfpea 0.0030 µg/L 1/6 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Dibromochloromethane
6.295 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.33 µg/L
134/135 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
76.95 µg/L 96%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 94.3 µg/L
131/132 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
15.065 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L
128/135 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
42.64 µg/L 71%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 66.2 µg/L
123/132 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
1052 µg/L 81%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 3400 µg/L
109/123 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
26.205 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40.4 µg/L
98/132 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
62.98 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 79.4 µg/L
97/135 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
25.125 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.62 µg/L
96/132 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
4.922 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.4 µg/L
89/135 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.548 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.68 µg/L
57/132 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.724 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.5 µg/L
45/132 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
35/35 LCR 2026
Lead
18.14 µg/L 121%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L
20/121 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.047 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.23 µg/L
7/132 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
80.19 µg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 84.3 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2014–2019
Fluoride
50 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2014–2019
Chromium
1 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2014–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.5 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
Lithium
15.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/6 UCMR-5 2024
58 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaMercuryNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrateNitrate-NitritePFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
LONDENSKY, ART
Phone
732-257-1999

Frequently asked questions about South River W Dept

Is South River W Dept tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in South River W Dept's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in South River W Dept's water?

EPA monitoring detected Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Copper, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does South River W Dept serve?

South River W Dept reports serving 16,000 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.

Has South River W Dept had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 96 violations on file for South River W Dept, of which 13 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.