Is Washington Crossing Park Estates Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Mercer

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

119

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2011-01-01 → 2011-01-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2011-01-01 → 2011-01-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2011-01-01 → 2011-01-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2011-01-01 → 2011-01-31
MR	Monitoring	Unaddressed	2025-10-21
MR	Monitoring	Unaddressed	2025-10-21
MR	Monitoring	Unaddressed	2025-10-21
RPT	Monitoring	Unaddressed	2025-02-11
MON	Monitoring	Archived	2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31
MON	Monitoring	Archived	2025-01-01 → 2025-01-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	162.2 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 373 µg/L	18/18	SYR4	2012–2018
Lead	0.0014 mg/L 9.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	17/17	LCR	2024
Nitrate	1870 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L	16/16	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	1.24 µg/L 8.3% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L	7/15	SYR4	2012–2018
TTHM	4.972 µg/L 6.2% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 5.65 µg/L	5/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromoform	1.387 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 1.39 µg/L	4/11	SYR4	2012–2019
Arsenic	3.43 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2012–2018
Barium	192.7 µg/L 9.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L worst single sample: 193 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2012–2018
Dibromochloromethane	0.8670 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 0.8900 µg/L	3/11	SYR4	2012–2019
Selenium	2.45 µg/L 4.9% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2012–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	6.5 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 7 µg/L	3/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Chromium	3.64 µg/L 3.6% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L	2/3	SYR4	2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid	2.915 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3 µg/L	2/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	5.65 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/11	SYR4	2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)	0.4000 pCi/L 8% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L	1/2	SYR4	2012–2018
Combined Uranium	3.7 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L	1/1	SYR4	2018
Dichloroacetic Acid	2 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Fluoride	500 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L	1/3	SYR4	2012–2018
Trichloroacetic Acid	4 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/8	SYR4	2012–2019

53 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: BEYER, CHRIS
Phone: 609-537-0219

Frequently asked questions about Washington Crossing Park Estates

Is Washington Crossing Park Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Washington Crossing Park Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Washington Crossing Park Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Lead, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Washington Crossing Park Estates serve?

Washington Crossing Park Estates reports serving 356 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.

Has Washington Crossing Park Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 119 violations on file for Washington Crossing Park Estates, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 8 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.